RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00789
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. She be entitled to Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders from
14 Sep 12 to 19 Dec 12.
2. She be entitled to 7.5 days of accrued leave.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 26 Jan 12, she sustained injuries while performing her
military duties; however, at the time of her release, she did
not receive any pay.
In accordance with the governing instructions, she should have
remained on orders until her medical situation was resolved.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of AFRC
IMT 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination (LOD) paperwork;
AF Form 938, Request and Authorization for Active Duty
Training/Active Duty Tour, dated 20 Dec 12; medical entries from
her civilian medical provider, and various other documents.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served on active duty, from 10 Mar 10 to 15 Sep
12. The applicants AFRC IMT 348 reflects that on 26 Jan 12,
she was treated for injuries to her back incurred while
performing honor guard duties at Dobbins ARB in Georgia.
On 15 Sep 12, the applicant was released from active duty. On
18 Sep 12, the LOD process began and on 5 Dec 12, the Air Force
Reserve Vice Commander (AFRC/CV), found that the applicant had
an injury that was In the Line of Duty (ILOD).
On 20 Dec 12, she was placed on MEDCON orders until 19 Jan 13.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFMOA/SGHI recommends denial. SGHI notes that since there is no
additional medical documentation provided to 19 Dec 12 that show
continuous active treatment/eligibility, they are unable to
recommend any further MEDCON eligibility.
According to information provided, it appears the applicant was
not granted MEDCON orders due to the following information:
The time and date of initial treatment as stated on the AFRC IMT
348 was 28 Jan 2012 [sic]. This treatment date is within the
stated orders claim dates and eligible for care on Military
Personnel Appropriation (MPA) orders.
On 28 Sept 2012, the Informal LOD was completed by the Wing
Commander (WG/CC). This completed LOD was 12 days after member
was removed from orders.
On 5 Dec 12, the Air Force Reserve Command Commander (AFRC/CC)
finalized the Line of Duty [sic]. The applicant did not provide
a treatment plan with either conservative Physical Therapy (PT)
or invasive surgical intervention for consideration until 28 Dec
12. At that time the applicant was rightfully not granted
MEDCON orders based on not meeting basic eligibility.
The complete SGHI evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Based on the current Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI),
the Air Force Reserve Command Instruction (AFRCI), and the
Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) policy letter, she should have
been continued on orders without a break in service, until she
was returned to duty or processed through the DES. Between the
dates of 26 Jan 12 to present, she has been seen and under
constant care and treatment by both military and civilian
providers.
She provides a timeline of the pertinent dates of treatment and
physician visits and states that the unit should have started
the LOD, medical continuation and orders process in Feb 12.
The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends amending the applicants
orders for the period 14 Sep 12 19 Dec 12.
BCMR Medical Consultant notes that while there appears to be a
gap in medical care documentation between the date of the
applicant's follow-up, on 4 Feb 12, and her initial documented
civilian follow-up care in Jul 12, while still under orders.
The Medical Consultant finds reasonable evidence the applicant's
medical condition warranted continuation of orders, as she
appeared to require continued treatment and failed to achieve a
durable recovery from her symptoms, through the time of
expiration of her orders, until a final disposition could be
determined, e.g., either returned to duty without duty
limitations or processed through the Disability Evaluation
System (DES). It is not known whether the aforementioned
medical information was timely supplied to the MEDCON decision
authorities or whether it was considered inadequate proof of a
duty impairing condition, noting the actual clinical evaluations
[examinations] describing the applicant's chief complaint and
the objective physical findings on examination are not supplied.
In conclusion, the issuance of a Duty Limiting Condition Report
does not automatically justify active duty orders, as a service
member may be assigned alternative duties. However, considering
the applicant injured herself while on active duty orders, that
her condition persisted through the termination of those orders,
and appears to have worsened after termination of those orders,
the Medical Consultant finds it reasonable to consider amending
the applicant's orders to cover the period 14 Sep 12 through
19 Dec 12.
The Medical Consultants complete evaluation is at Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 23 Oct 13 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit G).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. In this
respect, we note the applicant was on active duty orders and
sustained an injury to her lower back. While we note the
comments of the Air Force Medical Operations Agency (AFMOA);
nonetheless, the applicants case has undergone an exhaustive
review by the Air Force BCMR Medical Consultant and we are in
agreement with his recommendation that the applicants medical
condition warranted medical continuation orders. While the
applicant request orders beginning 14 Sep through 19 Dec 12,
since she was not released from active duty until 15 Sep 12, we
recommend her medical continuation orders begin the day
following her release from active duty (16 Sep 12). Regarding
the applicants request for 7.5 days of accrued leave, based on
her corrected record, her leave will accrue in accordance with
the applicable Department of Defense and Air Force instructions.
In view of the above, we recommend her record be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was
placed on active duty from 16 September 2012 to 19 December
2012, for the purposes of medical continuation in accordance
with Title 10 U.S.C. Section 12301(h).
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-00789 in Executive Session on 17 Dec 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jan 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFMOA/SGHI, dated 8 Jul 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Aug 13.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Sep 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 23 Oct 13.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 23 Oct 13.
Panel Chair
1
4
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01000
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01000 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for the period 17 Sep 11 to 30 Jul 12; or in the alternative she receive Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay for the period she was released from MEDCON orders. In accordance with AFRCI 36-3004, Incapacitation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00118
The Medical Consultant states that the applicant may be eligible for at least periodic restoration of active duty orders to receive treatment for his medical condition on the dates he was required to take leave from his civilian employment, but finds the evidence insufficient to establish MEDCON orders along the entire continuum requested; noting the evidence suggesting that his medical condition waxed and waned while under treatment with epidural and sacroiliac steroid injections; allowing...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05854
His records be corrected to show that he was not released from active duty on 7 Aug 12, but instead continued on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until 4 Sep 12. § 1207a, a disabling condition will be found to be in the line of duty (ILOD) if it becomes unfitting, even though the condition existed prior to service (EPTS), if the member has at least eight years of cumulative active service, and the member was on active duty orders specifying a period of more than 30 days at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03804
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFMOA/SGHI recommends granting the applicants request to remain on active duty orders and receive service points for the time period of 13 Sep through 26 Oct 12 [sic] indicating, the applicant would not have been released from active duty, but would have received six weeks of physical therapy for his injury had his injury originally been found in the line of duty (LOD). While the evidence of record indicates that his line of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01088
Medical Continuation, Eligibility for Medical continuation, the ARC member will be eligible for Medical Continuation orders when an injury, illness, or disease is incurred or aggravated while serving on active duty and that condition renders the member unable to perform military duties." We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00637
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00637 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders starting on 20 Sep 12 vice 10 Oct 12, based on his injury he sustained In the Line of Duty (INLOD). ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03992
In this respect, we note the applicant was on active duty orders in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and was diagnosed with a medical injury. While the applicant requests continuation of his active duty orders for the period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 11, we concur with the recommendation of AFMOA/SGHI to correct the record to reflect the applicant was retained on active duty orders for the period 19 Jun 11 to 27 Jul 11. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00485
The medical unit had no records of the applicant since he retired and his records were sent to the Medical Record Repository. §12302 orders at the time of injury. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that for the period 16 Jun 05 to 30 Jul 05, he was placed on active duty, for the purposes of medical continuation in accordance...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04977
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04977 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was not released from active duty on 2 Sep 11, but was instead retained on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until 16 Nov 11. Severalattempts were made to secure MEDCON orders with no responses...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04296
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his previous contentions that he injured himself on 27 November 2010 while on active duty orders. He was unwillingly taken off of active duty orders and the 934 ASTS failed to process the MedCon orders in a timely manner. The AFMOA/SGHI recommendation is noted; however, we believe continuance on active duty orders until such time as his LOD medical condition...